Netatalk Problem?

Einrichten des lokalen Netzes, Verbindung zu anderen Computern und Diensten.
Antworten
Pengo
Beiträge: 54
Registriert: 16.03.2003 22:00:02
Wohnort: Kiel
Kontaktdaten:

Netatalk Problem?

Beitrag von Pengo » 29.06.2004 10:12:18

Hallo,
die Netzverbindung zwischen meinem Apple Share (Netatalk) und den MACs scheint instabil zu laufen. Kann jemand diese Meldungen interpretieren?

/var/log/messages am Linuxrechner:

Code: Alles auswählen

Jun 29 09:16:55 kielinux2 atalkd[99]: [rtmp.c:264]: I:ATalkDaemon: rtmp_free: 2-3
Jun 29 09:16:55 kielinux2 atalkd[99]: [main.c:377]: I:ATalkDaemon: as_timer last gateway down
Jun 29 09:16:59 kielinux2 atalkd[99]: [rtmp.c:473]: I:ATalkDaemon: rtmp_packet router has become available
Jun 29 09:16:59 kielinux2 atalkd[99]: [zip.c:910]: I:ATalkDaemon: zip_getnetinfo for eth0
Jun 29 09:17:00 kielinux2 atalkd[99]: [zip.c:738]: I:ATalkDaemon: zip_packet configured eth0 from 2.8
Jun 29 09:17:26 kielinux2 atalkd[99]: [rtmp.c:580]: I:ATalkDaemon: rtmp_packet gateway 2.8 up
Jun 29 09:18:15 kielinux2 atalkd[99]: [main.c:324]: I:ATalkDaemon: as_timer gateway 2.8 down
Jun 29 09:18:15 kielinux2 atalkd[99]: [rtmp.c:264]: I:ATalkDaemon: rtmp_free: 2-3
Jun 29 09:18:15 kielinux2 atalkd[99]: [main.c:377]: I:ATalkDaemon: as_timer last gateway down
Jun 29 09:18:23 kielinux2 atalkd[99]: [rtmp.c:473]: I:ATalkDaemon: rtmp_packet router has become available
Jun 29 09:18:23 kielinux2 atalkd[99]: [zip.c:910]: I:ATalkDaemon: zip_getnetinfo for eth0
Jun 29 09:18:24 kielinux2 atalkd[99]: [zip.c:738]: I:ATalkDaemon: zip_packet configured eth0 from 2.8
Jun 29 09:18:50 kielinux2 atalkd[99]: [rtmp.c:580]: I:ATalkDaemon: rtmp_packet gateway 2.8 up
Jun 29 09:19:15 kielinux2 atalkd[99]: [main.c:324]: I:ATalkDaemon: as_timer gateway 2.8 down
Jun 29 09:19:15 kielinux2 atalkd[99]: [rtmp.c:264]: I:ATalkDaemon: rtmp_free: 2-3
Jun 29 09:19:15 kielinux2 atalkd[99]: [main.c:377]: I:ATalkDaemon: as_timer last gateway down
Jun 29 09:19:18 kielinux2 atalkd[99]: [rtmp.c:473]: I:ATalkDaemon: rtmp_packet router has become available
Jun 29 09:19:18 kielinux2 atalkd[99]: [zip.c:910]: I:ATalkDaemon: zip_getnetinfo for eth0
Jun 29 09:19:19 kielinux2 atalkd[99]: [zip.c:738]: I:ATalkDaemon: zip_packet configured eth0 from 2.8
Jun 29 09:19:47 kielinux2 atalkd[99]: [rtmp.c:580]: I:ATalkDaemon: rtmp_packet gateway 2.8 up
Und das ist das Logfile vom MAC:

Code: Alles auswählen

Jun 28 15:30:22 localhost kernel: AFP_VFS afpfs UserCommand:  sosend failed for reply 55
Jun 28 15:30:22 localhost kernel: AFP_VFS afpfs UserCommand:  sosend failed for request 32
Jun 28 15:30:22 localhost kernel: AFP_VFS afpfs_Reconnect started /Volumes/MAC 1
Jun 28 15:30:22 localhost kernel: AFP_VFS afpfs_Reconnect:  Wrong version 4 or no more attempts 0
Jun 28 15:30:22 localhost kernel: AFP_VFS afpfs UserCommand:  sosend failed for request 57
Jun 28 15:30:22 localhost kernel: AFP_VFS afpfs_Reconnect started /Volumes/MAC 3
Jun 28 15:30:22 localhost kernel: AFP_VFS afpfs_Reconnect:  Wrong version 4 or no more attempts 0
Jun 28 15:30:22 localhost kernel: AFP_VFS afpfs UserCommand:  sosend failed for request 57
Jun 28 15:30:22 localhost kernel: AFP_VFS afpfs_Reconnect started /Volumes/MAC 2
Jun 28 15:30:22 localhost kernel: AFP_VFS afpfs_Reconnect:  Wrong version 4 or no more attempts 0
Jun 28 15:30:22 localhost kernel: AFP_VFS afpfs_unmount: /Volumes/MAC 3, flags 524288, pid 459
Jun 28 15:30:23 localhost kernel: AFP_VFS afpfs_unmount:  succeeded
Jun 28 15:30:23 localhost kernel: AFP_VFS afpfs_unmount: /Volumes/MAC 1, flags 524288, pid 461
Jun 28 15:30:23 localhost kernel: AFP_VFS afpfs_unmount:  succeeded
Jun 28 15:30:23 localhost kernel: AFP_VFS afpfs_unmount: /Volumes/MAC 2, flags 524288, pid 460
Jun 28 15:30:23 localhost kernel: AFP_VFS afpfs_unmount:  succeeded
Jun 28 15:32:50 localhost kernel: AFP_VFS afpfs_mount: /Volumes/MAC 3, pid 349
Jun 28 15:32:50 localhost kernel: AFP_VFS afpfs_mount: /Volumes/MAC 2, pid 349
Jun 28 15:32:50 localhost kernel: AFP_VFS afpfs_mount: /Volumes/MAC 1, pid 349
vor allem, was bedeutet das?

Code: Alles auswählen

Wrong version 4 or no more attempts 0 
Ich danke Euch im Voraus.
Gruß
Pengo

Antworten